Is the chaos brought about by a dangerous AI likely to be confined to one country? Or would it easily skip over national borders? If the latter, then perhaps the chaos-in-the-US-but-not-in-China scenario is less likely than made out to be. I do not know the answer, though. To some extent, the very notion of an AI arms race supposes that the impact of AI can be kept (fairly) local.
Is the chaos brought about by a dangerous AI likely to be confined to one country? Or would it easily skip over national borders? If the latter, then perhaps the chaos-in-the-US-but-not-in-China scenario is less likely than made out to be. I do not know the answer, though. To some extent, the very notion of an AI arms race supposes that the impact of AI can be kept (fairly) local.
Depends on the nature of the chaos. Disruption of the job market, for example, could differ significantly among nations depending on how they regulate uses of AI.
Is the chaos brought about by a dangerous AI likely to be confined to one country? Or would it easily skip over national borders? If the latter, then perhaps the chaos-in-the-US-but-not-in-China scenario is less likely than made out to be. I do not know the answer, though. To some extent, the very notion of an AI arms race supposes that the impact of AI can be kept (fairly) local.
Depends on the nature of the chaos. Disruption of the job market, for example, could differ significantly among nations depending on how they regulate uses of AI.