New big data study of 145 countries show COVID vaccines makes things worse (cases and deaths)
A new study by Kyle A. Beattie entitled “Worldwide Bayesian Causal Impact Analysis of Vaccine Administration on Deaths and Cases Associated with COVID-19: A Big Data Analysis of 145 Countries” concluded that vaccines are doing the opposite of what they were promised to do.
This is hardly the first study to reach those conclusions. These studies, all done independently, found the same thing—the more you vaccinate, the worse things get.
The Lyons-Weiler paper
The Harvard study
The German study
The Denmark study (which shows Dr. James was right; you have to boost every 30 days to maintain protection.
German government data (this is from The Expose)
80% of the COVID deaths in the UK are vaccinated
Lancet: 89% Of New UK COVID Cases Among Fully Vaxxed
So it's not clear to me. I've come to distrust the mainstream reporting on this. I've seen first hand how they ignore studies (such as FLCCC reports) that don't fit the big pharma narrative. And Fauci seems to be their man.
I could be wrong, but that's what I believe. Or, rather, that's what I don't believe (WHO, CDC, Fauci, NY Times, ...).
respectfully, this is not a rabbit hole i'd like to go down. statistics on death & hospitalization rates among vaxxed vs non-vaxxed death are consistent around the world and they show unequivocally the benefit of the vaccines.
but i will point out one immediate fallacy in what you shared which indicates all this "evidence" of vaccine ineffectiveness - is really just a house of cards...
"80% of the COVID deaths in the UK are vaccinated"
indeed, this makes perfect sense! because the UK has high vax rates (about 90% one shot & 75% double) so it follows that most deaths would be among the vaccinated. for instance, if you had 10 vaccinated people living in a house and one died of covid, then 100% of covid deaths in this home would be among those fully vaccinated.
again, this is a statistical anomaly which fails to tell the true story of the vaccine's efficacy in that home - or in the UK as the case may be.
You've made an extremely important point. In a hypothetical population in which 100% of individuals were vaccinated, EVERY infection that got through would be among people who were vaccinated.
This does not mean the vaccines aren't working as expected.
sure thing...good chatting....btw I invite u to read about "Simpson's Paradox" which is the anomaly I referenced above. unless accounted for, seemingly straightforward stats will be skewed incorrectly.
Regarding vaccine efficacy -- https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/new-big-data-study-of-145-countries
New big data study of 145 countries show COVID vaccines makes things worse (cases and deaths)
A new study by Kyle A. Beattie entitled “Worldwide Bayesian Causal Impact Analysis of Vaccine Administration on Deaths and Cases Associated with COVID-19: A Big Data Analysis of 145 Countries” concluded that vaccines are doing the opposite of what they were promised to do.
This is hardly the first study to reach those conclusions. These studies, all done independently, found the same thing—the more you vaccinate, the worse things get.
The Lyons-Weiler paper
The Harvard study
The German study
The Denmark study (which shows Dr. James was right; you have to boost every 30 days to maintain protection.
German government data (this is from The Expose)
80% of the COVID deaths in the UK are vaccinated
Lancet: 89% Of New UK COVID Cases Among Fully Vaxxed
So it's not clear to me. I've come to distrust the mainstream reporting on this. I've seen first hand how they ignore studies (such as FLCCC reports) that don't fit the big pharma narrative. And Fauci seems to be their man.
I could be wrong, but that's what I believe. Or, rather, that's what I don't believe (WHO, CDC, Fauci, NY Times, ...).
respectfully, this is not a rabbit hole i'd like to go down. statistics on death & hospitalization rates among vaxxed vs non-vaxxed death are consistent around the world and they show unequivocally the benefit of the vaccines.
but i will point out one immediate fallacy in what you shared which indicates all this "evidence" of vaccine ineffectiveness - is really just a house of cards...
"80% of the COVID deaths in the UK are vaccinated"
indeed, this makes perfect sense! because the UK has high vax rates (about 90% one shot & 75% double) so it follows that most deaths would be among the vaccinated. for instance, if you had 10 vaccinated people living in a house and one died of covid, then 100% of covid deaths in this home would be among those fully vaccinated.
again, this is a statistical anomaly which fails to tell the true story of the vaccine's efficacy in that home - or in the UK as the case may be.
You've made an extremely important point. In a hypothetical population in which 100% of individuals were vaccinated, EVERY infection that got through would be among people who were vaccinated.
This does not mean the vaccines aren't working as expected.
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree for now. Thanks for the feedback -- hope to see you here in the future.
sure thing...good chatting....btw I invite u to read about "Simpson's Paradox" which is the anomaly I referenced above. unless accounted for, seemingly straightforward stats will be skewed incorrectly.