In the New York Times, psychologist Daniel Willingham dissects curiosity, explains why it so often hijacked by the internet to ignoble ends
, and offers some tips for fighting the hijackers.
In Fast Company, Harry McCracken asks
whether Verizon, the current owner of Yahoo, is acting responsibly in deleting the archives of Yahoo Groups, a once-thriving ecosystem of online communities. “Verizon is eradicating a meaningful chunk of the internet’s collective memory
,” McCracken writes. “The Yahoo Groups archive is an irreplaceable record of what people cared about in its heyday.” This won’t be the first Yahoo-related digicide. As Jordan Pearson notes
in Vice, “In 2009, Yahoo shut down GeoCities, taking roughly 7 million personal websites with it.”
Two years ago in Politico Magazine, social scientists Alan Abramowitz and Steven Webster explained
what “negative partisanship
” (see “Virality and virulence,” above) is and why its growth is bad for American politics.
In Politico, Aaron David Miller, Eugene Rumer, and Richard Sokolsky lay out
“what Trump gets right about Syria
.” Among their points: “the foreign policy establishment—the ‘blob’—has spilled a lot more ink complaining that his move benefits Russia than thinking about its actual effect on U.S. interests.” Two points about this point: (1) It meshes with my complaint about New York Times coverage of Syria, above; (2) It uses the semi-derisive term ‘blob’ for the foreign policy establishment—even though these authors, especially Miller, would traditionally have been thought of as members of that establishment. This is a welcome sign that the spirit of anti-blobism may be spreading from fringe renegades (me, for example, or Stephen Wertheim and Trita Parsi of the new and edgy Quincy Institute
, who have a very worthwhile piece
about Trump’s Syria policy in Foreign Policy this week) into parts of the mainstream. Hey Richard Haass
, the phone call is coming from inside the house!
In a week when a New York Times op-ed advocated banning facial recognition technology “in both public and private sectors,”
on the growing if still quite limited use of the technology in schools.
This week a retired admiral—and former commander of US Special Operations—won much applause by saying
in a New York Times op-ed that Trump is a threat to the Republic and suggesting that this view is shared by many of the admiral’s peers
. I’m ambivalent about this. I feel a bit uncomfortable when a former flag officer who implies that he speaks for many in the military writes that “it is time for a new person in the Oval Office” and “the sooner the better.” I realize he’s thinking about impeachment, not a coup, but I guess I’m old school; my father was a career army officer, and back in his day he and many other officers felt so strongly about the importance of separating the military from politics that they didn’t even vote. I have no doubt that that the admiral, William McRaven, is genuinely worried about the Republic. Me too. But but one thing about the Republic that worries me is that we’ve gotten to a point where we’re desperately looking to the military for political guidance.
Anti-trust tweet of the week:
On Thursday Mark Zuckerberg, in a speech at Georgetown, declared
that it isn’t Facebook’s role to play speech police. As he put it
in an interview, “I don’t think people want to live in a world where you can only say things that tech companies decide are 100 percent true.” In response to which Gabriel Snyder, former editor of The New Republic, tweeted
that what people don’t want is “to live in a world where just *ONE* tech company decides what people can say.”
Thanks to all the readers who emailed us (firstname.lastname@example.org
) in response to last week’s newsletter. Several, responding to my lamentation about the dearth of anti-war activism among Buddhists and for that matter among progressives, directed me to welcome exceptions. Two readers—Jeff A. and Dat D.—mentioned the venerable Quaker group Friends Committee on National Legislation
. Alan R. of Santa Cruz, an ordained Zen priest, hailed his local chapter of the Buddhist Peace Fellowship
. And Elizabeth F. provided a master list
of pro-peace groups. (You have to scroll down to get to the Peace/Anti-War section, and if you’re not disciplined you may be diverted to some other kind of activism before you get there. Be strong!)